Dear Editor,
Waiting for predictable disasters before taking action is usually costly and tragic. So, yes, mitigation is a good thing. However, mitigation strategies should be based on the best available data, not false narratives.
We won’t log...
This item is available in full to subscribers.
At this time, we ask you to confirm your subscription at www.themtnear.com, to continue accessing the only weekly paper in the Peak to Peak region to cover ALL the news you need! Simply click Confirm my subscription now!.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Questions? Call us at 303-810-5409 or email info@themountainear.com.
Please log in to continue |
Dear Editor,
Waiting for predictable disasters before taking action is usually costly and tragic. So, yes, mitigation is a good thing. However, mitigation strategies should be based on the best available data, not false narratives.
We won’t log ourselves out of the wildfire crisis, especially not using environmentally egregious methods like clearcutting. The most destructive wildfires are wind-driven, and chainsaws can't stop the wind or flying embers that travel miles.
Effective mitigation of wildfire destruction starts with our homes and constructing or retrofitting them to be fire-resistant. Defensible space around them and our communities is also critical, as is a well-educated, well-prepared community.
Logging in remote forests does not accomplish these goals and should be abandoned as a wildfire risk reduction strategy. It does not keep people or their property safer.
Jennifer Normoyle
Hillsborough, CA