Clyde Burnett, Boulder County.
Today’s questions of scientific facts debated by government’s emphasis of human
rules favoring a capitalistic system of economy have endangered our planet
This item is available in full to subscribers.
At this time, we ask you to confirm your subscription at www.themtnear.com, to continue accessing the only weekly paper in the Peak to Peak region to cover ALL the news you need! Simply click Confirm my subscription now!.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Questions? Call us at 303-810-5409 or email info@themountainear.com.
Please log in to continue |
Clyde Burnett, Boulder County.
Today’s questions of scientific facts debated by government’s emphasis of human
rules favoring a capitalistic system of economy have endangered our planet and
civilization from CO2 pollution by the increased human population. Much of the
atmospheric science is observable every day, and most folks are familiar with the models.
This is not so true for the radiation that is driving our climate change. I will attempt here
to correct the situation for our voters.
May I remind readers of the more trivial atmospheric facts? We may imagine a
model of its structure as a gas of widely spaced molecules like very small ping pong balls
free to move about with varying amounts of kinetic energy of motion; the average energy
we measure as temperature. Gases are compressible and can exert pressure. So, our
atmospheric density and temperature decreases with altitude.
We are also somewhat familiar with electromagnetic radiation, largely by virtue of
our eye’s sensitivity to visible light. We may also be familiar with its transport of energy
by skin sensitivity, including painful sunburn from solar ultraviolet.
Scientists have long ago documented the intensity distribution of radiation in the
special case of thermal equilibrium with its heat source, usually called heat radiation, for
example a fireplace, incandescent lamp, or the sun or the Earth’s surface, This may be
mathematically fitted by a model of vibrating electric charges with particular dependence
on a Kelvin temperature, T. An additional energy distribution factor is necessary. This is
a factor of radiation energy proportional to frequency, E = hf. The factor h was identified
by Max Planck as a fundamental constant of nature, the beginning of the quantum theory
of matter.
It is now a useful model of radiation to think of the waves of electromagnetic
radiation as photons with energy E = hf. These photons, in the case of heat radiation, may
be thought to work in equilibrium collisions with the ping pong balls of kinetic energy.
This radiant energy and frequency distribution of heat energy depends only on the
temperature T.
The mechanical and electrical structure of the trace molecules of water, carbon
dioxide, and methane are appropriate for absorption and emission of specific energies of
infrared radiation. It is the quantized vibration and rotation energy structure of these trace
molecules that works for the absorption of low frequency infrared photons with E = hf.
(See diagram from Fig 5 of Nature’s Greenhouse: Ominous Developments by Alex Cook
and J. George.)
Now we see how these trace molecules can absorb and trap their characteristic
frequencies, and only those frequencies, of the heat radiation from the earth. The
maximum intensity of the Earth’s heat radiation at Kelvin temperature T = 288 K (15 C)
is just where the characteristic absorption frequencies exist. The dense layers of these
molecules in the lower atmosphere can serve as a warm blanket that maintains the surface
temperature favorable for the evolution of humans and their supporting environment of
plants and animals. The trapping is less efficient at the lower densities at higher altitudes
and the escaping radiation is at the effective radiation balance surface of 255 K (minus 18 C).
Question: How does science affect government policies?
Answer: An example: Galileo has been called the Father of Modern Science in view
of his scientific observation test of the Church ruling of Earth as center of Universe. This
finally resulted, due to the correct solar system science, in diminishing the Church’s
universal dominance. Can we hope for similar changes in our Federal Government?