Dear Editor,
We hear a lot of polling, and now primary, data that reports the percentage of votes a candidate receives or the percentage of people who would vote for a candidate.
What seems to
This item is available in full to subscribers.
At this time, we ask you to confirm your subscription at www.themtnear.com, to continue accessing the only weekly paper in the Peak to Peak region to cover ALL the news you need! Simply click Confirm my subscription now!.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Questions? Call us at 303-810-5409 or email info@themountainear.com.
Please log in to continue |
Dear Editor,
We hear a lot of polling, and now primary, data that reports the percentage of votes a candidate receives or the percentage of people who would vote for a candidate.
What seems to be missing is some proportional context. Many voters here in Colorado are unaffiliated. Where is their representation in these polls?
During primaries, when a candidate receives a certain number of their own party’s votes, what % of the district’s registered voters’ does this represent?
Even though unaffiliated voters are able to participate in a primary of their choosing, how many actually do? Some clear graphics showing total number of votes cast along with the percentage the candidate received within their own party, compared to the total registered and eligible voter number would give a more realistic picture of how many voters it takes to bring a candidate to the final polls.
Maybe even more eligible voters would participate if the conversation included a more balanced representation of all voters.
Do more of us need to ask more explicitly for our news outlets to offer us this more complete coverage?
Thanks so much for reading and hopefully see you at the polls!
Annette Treufeldt-Franck
Nederland